COP20—Lima Local weather Convention — World Points

by

[ad_1]

Writer and Web page info

  • by Anup Shah
  • This web page Created

On this web page:

  1. Introduction
  2. Assembly end result
  3. Mainstream media reporting
  4. In context: frequent however differentiated duties
  5. Extra info
  6. Information tales from IPS

Introduction

December 1 – 14, 2014, Lima, Peru was the venue for the twentieth annual United Nations Local weather Change Convention, also called the twentieth Convention of the Events — or COP 20.

The aim of this convention was to create a common settlement on local weather change motion and start the method of financing mitigation.

Again to high

Assembly end result

The assembly ended with all nations agreeing to chop again greenhouse fuel emissions. Often known as the Lima Accord, this treaty is just not legally binding and international locations don’t have to specify how a lot they may in the reduction of, as a substitute agreeing to report their plans again by March 2015.

Whereas for a lot of it appeared like a profitable end result, others have been disillusioned, equivalent to poor international locations struggling to rebuild from present impacts of local weather change who have been alarmed on the disappearance of loss and harm commitments from the ultimate textual content which has been a part of the dialogue for years.

The worldwide local weather motion, 350.org, summarized the disappointments and hopeful points of the assembly end result, noting

  1. The brand new settlement doesn’t mirror the urgency of the local weather disaster
  2. Some good agreements – however no measures to make sure implementation
  3. Least developed and susceptible nations neglected within the chilly
  4. Divestment (from fossil gasoline reliance) is extra vital than ever
  5. World momentum for actual options is stronger than ever and can carry on going.

In attempting to place a optimistic spin on the general disappointment they felt, they concluded, Ultimately, a worldwide local weather treaty is only one device to fight local weather change. Actual change goes to proceed to return from the grassroots. The UN Local weather Talks proceed to be a spot the place the world’s international locations comes collectively to debate this disaster and individuals are placing in monumental efforts to verify Paris [the next global meeting] received’t be like Copenhagen which was stuffed with disappointments regardless of large guarantees.

Samantha Smith, Chief of WWF’s World Local weather and Power Initiative, was fairly scathing of the assembly end result saying that political expediency received over scientific urgency. She additionally famous that Developed nation governments couldn’t even handle to elucidate how they may ship the long-promised US$100 billion per yr in local weather finance by 2020. In a transfer that seemingly dismissed the plight of essentially the most susceptible international locations, they utterly eliminated any significant language about ‘loss and harm’.

Again to high

Mainstream media reporting

As with virtually each earlier assembly (with occasional exceptions), mainstream media reporting was very poor given the significance of this world difficulty. The place the assembly was reported it was typically in direction of the tip, and simply sound chew kind summaries saying all international locations agreed to emission cuts and that this was a serious enchancment.

Whereas the treaty continued to say it honors the long-standing frequent however differentiated duties the mainstream media reporting (as in most years) has usually failed to supply clarification and context of this precept that has been an vital a part of these talks for over 2 a long time; that poor and creating international locations mustn’t bear the identical duties because the developed ones (as a result of they don’t seem to be the reason for the anthropogenic carbon emissions over the earlier a long time which have led to this, which is detailed far more on this website’s web page on local weather justice).

A touch in direction of this precept might have been introduced as a viewpoint of China or India, given the impression they’re being obstacles, slightly then explaining this precept in additional context.

That was simply one of many points skirted over or omitted from frequent reporting. Others included points on financing, know-how help for poorer nations, and so forth. Behind the scenes, for many years, wealthy international locations have stalled on these items or actively prevented attempting to share know-how and so forth, which is barely reported.

Yearly, this criticism is manufactured from mainstream reporting, so with out following these negotiations annually, it may be straightforward to return away with the impression that this assembly had a optimistic end result.

However as this dialogue hosted by Democracy Now! reveals, there have been plenty of vital problems with rivalry:

Emissions-Chopping Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Stop Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014.

Again to high

In context: frequent however differentiated duties

A few years in the past all nations agreed that local weather change was largely the results of actions from in the present day’s industrialized nations, as carbon dioxide — the principle greenhouse fuel — stays within the ambiance for many years. But, the poorest would find yourself struggling essentially the most for an issue they largely didn’t trigger. The approaches to mitigation (emissions discount) would due to this fact be totally different for these teams of nations — the frequent however differentiated duties precept.

It’s on this context that the dialogue for loss and harm has come about. And it’s one thing that wealthy international locations are eager to eliminate .

The years of resistance on this difficulty (and plenty of others) means every time it’s mentioned once more the reactions appear to get much more hostile. Mixed with the shortage of detailed context within the mainstream media protection of this side, it then turns into simpler every time to see culprits as China and India given their monumental greenhouse emissions in recent times, in comparison with the far better quantity by the industrialized nations over the longer interval. See this website’s part on local weather justice for extra detailed background.

And as this website has mentioned for years on the local weather justice web page, the wealthy nations are delaying any significant motion till it’s ultimately — and disproportionately — paid for the by the creating nations. New Delhi primarily based Nitin Sethi, affiliate editor at Enterprise Customary, interviewed within the earlier talked about video says the identical factor, however extra frankly:

There is no such thing as a motion that’s going to occur between now and 2020. All of that was to be performed by the developed international locations. They [rich nations] mainly have simply mentioned at Lima that we aren’t going to do any greater than what we’re doing up to now, and the burden can shift onto the post-2020 period, the place different creating international locations must share it. So, to me, it signifies actually negotiation in dangerous religion.

Nitin Sethi, Emissions-Chopping Deal Reached at COP 20 Lima, However Will It Assist Stop Catastrophic Local weather Change?, Democracy Now!, December 15, 2014

Again to high

Extra info

Because the convention remains to be underway as this web page is written, extra info shall be added right here after the occasion is over.

For extra in regards to the points from different organizations, listed here are some beginning factors:

Again to high

Information tales from IPS

Beneath is an inventory of tales from Inter Press Service associated to the Lima local weather convention and its aftermath.

  1. COP28: Strengthen Local weather Resilience in Small and Susceptible Nations